Deal Journey — Sample Multifamily Deal
The Answer
Sample Multifamily Deal
400 units · 306,886 SF · Built 1981 · multifamily
Cactus valuation
$36.0M – $39.0M
Midpoint $37.4M · 6.25% going-in cap
Critical assumptions
Chosen for what each one moves the value, how certain it is, and any changes you made.
- Current Market Cap RateAt 6.5%, value moves $1.4M; levered IRR moves 183 bps6.25%Low confidence; material valuation or return sensitivity
- Property Tax GrowthAt 3.5%, value is unchanged; levered IRR moves 38 bps3%Low confidence; model sensitivity tested
- Annual Rent GrowthAt 3.5%, value is unchanged; levered IRR moves 157 bps3%Low confidence; material valuation or return sensitivity
- ConcessionsAt 1.7%, value moves $356.0K; levered IRR moves 1 bps1.2%Low confidence; material valuation or return sensitivity
- Other Income GrowthAt 3%, value is unchanged; levered IRR moves 23 bps2.5%Low confidence; model sensitivity tested
- Tax Assessment RatioAt 99.5%, value and levered IRR are unchanged100%Low confidence; model sensitivity tested
- Property Tax RateAt 2.5%, value and levered IRR are unchanged2%Low confidence; model sensitivity tested
The deal in brief
One finding per chapter. Select a line to read the chapter.
Chapter 1 · Where does the income come from?
The Income Story
$12.5K a year
: 1 of 9 plans rent below target, and the underwriting closes the gap over 24 months.
A3 has the widest gap to target, at $10.95 a month
Each plan's gap to target rent, per unit per month. Together the plans add $12.5K a year.
Today is what tenants pay now. Target (as-is) is the achievable rent this underwriting uses.
- Units
- 81
- Today
- $770
- Target (as-is)
- $770$1.28/SF
- Monthly gap to target, per unit
- At target
- Units
- 52
- Today
- $837
- Target (as-is)
- $837$1.20/SF
- Monthly gap to target, per unit
- At target
- Units
- 95
- Today
- $902
- Target (as-is)
- $913$1.22/SF
- Monthly gap to target, per unit
- +$10.95+1.2%
- Units
- 20
- Today
- $776
- Target (as-is)
- $776$1.48/SF
- Monthly gap to target, per unit
- At target
- Units
- 12
- Today
- $1,001
- Target (as-is)
- $1,001$1.28/SF
- Monthly gap to target, per unit
- At target
- Units
- 48
- Today
- $1,127
- Target (as-is)
- $1,127$1.25/SF
- Monthly gap to target, per unit
- At target
- Units
- 24
- Today
- $1,117
- Target (as-is)
- $1,117$1.31/SF
- Monthly gap to target, per unit
- At target
- Units
- 20
- Today
- $1,231
- Target (as-is)
- $1,231$1.29/SF
- Monthly gap to target, per unit
- At target
- Units
- 48
- Today
- $1,193
- Target (as-is)
- $1,193$1.19/SF
- Monthly gap to target, per unit
- At target
The market benchmark is $770 to $1,240, depending on the plan.
Rental comparables — 10 selected
Comparables used to set market rent
- Plan
- 1BR/1BA
- Avg size
- 634 SF
- Observed rent
- $764
- Rent / SF
- $1.21
- Plan
- 2BR/1.5BA
- Avg size
- 819 SF
- Observed rent
- $1,068
- Rent / SF
- $1.30
- Plan
- 2BR/2BA
- Avg size
- 1,018 SF
- Observed rent
- $1,168
- Rent / SF
- $1.15
- Plan
- 1BR/1BA
- Avg size
- 643 SF
- Observed rent
- $827
- Rent / SF
- $1.29
- Plan
- 2BR/2BA
- Avg size
- 943 SF
- Observed rent
- $929
- Rent / SF
- $0.99
- Plan
- 1BR/1BA
- Avg size
- 622 SF
- Observed rent
- $716
- Rent / SF
- $1.15
- Plan
- 2BR/2BA
- Avg size
- 982 SF
- Observed rent
- $959
- Rent / SF
- $0.98
- Plan
- 1BR/1BA
- Avg size
- 595 SF
- Observed rent
- $778
- Rent / SF
- $1.31
- Plan
- 2BR/2BA
- Avg size
- 761 SF
- Observed rent
- $1,101
- Rent / SF
- $1.45
- Plan
- 1BR/1.5BA
- Avg size
- 1,046 SF
- Observed rent
- $1,175
- Rent / SF
- $1.12
Chapter 2 · What reduces that income?
Revenue Reality
$4.61M
in Year 1. The property is 88.5% occupied today; the underwriting assumes 92.0% once stabilized.
Vacancy takes the most rent, $408.9K; other income adds back $576.8K
Year 1, from the rent the property could bill to the income it collects.
- Gross potential rent$4,585,764
- Renovation downtime$0
- Vacancy-$408,887
- Bad debt-$91,715
- Concessions-$55,029
- Net rental income$4,030,133
- Other income$576,848
- Dated income changes$0
- Effective gross income$4,606,981
Income statement
Cactus kept all 12 T-12 income lines as reported.
- T-12
- $4,714,715
- T-12
- $271,597
- T-12
- $121,256
- T-12
- $114,116
- T-12
- -$148,082
- T-12
- -$387,658
Chapter 3 · What does it cost to operate?
The Cost Story
$2.41M
. Cactus kept all 12 T-12 expense lines as reported.
Property Tax is the largest cost at $659.1K, then payroll & benefits at $431.5K
T-12 operating expenses, Jun 2024 – May 2025
- Property Tax$659.1K
- Payroll & Benefits$431.5K
- Property Insurance$344.8K
- Utilities$297.6K
- Management Fee$136.7K
- Contract Services$127.8K
- General & Administrative$57.8K
- Repairs & Maintenance$38.2K
- Professional Fees$37.0K
- Turnover / Make Ready$36.2K
- Advertising & Marketing$31.5K
- Other Operating Expenses$86
Operating expenses
Cactus kept all 12 T-12 expense lines as reported.
- Reported
- $659,119
- Normalized
- $659,119
- Reported
- $431,473
- Normalized
- $431,473
- Reported
- $344,793
- Normalized
- $344,793
- Reported
- $297,626
- Normalized
- $297,626
- Reported
- $136,659
- Normalized
- $136,659
- Reported
- $127,759
- Normalized
- $127,759
- T-12 NOI as reported
- $2,410,534
- Income adjustments
- $0
- Expense adjustments
- $0
- Normalized NOI
- $2,410,534
Chapter 4 · Why does Cactus believe this valuation?
Why This Value
$2,338,524 ÷ 6.25% = $37.4M
divided by the . That is $93,541 per unit and $122 per square foot.
At a 6.50% cap, the value is $36.0M
Value at each cap rate in the range, on the same $2.34M valuation NOI
- 6.50% cap$36.0M
- 6.25% capmidpoint$37.4M
- 6.00% cap$39.0M
Sale comparable evidence was not available for this property, so the value rests on the NOI and cap rate above.
From normalized T-12 NOI to valuation NOI
Valuation basis: Year 1 Underwritten
- Normalized T-12 NOI
- $2,410,534
- Underwriting changes
- -$72,011
- Valuation NOI
- $2,338,524
What moved it: the normalized T-12 against Year 1, the year the valuation capitalizes.
- Normalized T-12
- $4.61M
- Year 1
- $4.61M
- Normalized T-12
- $2.20M
- Year 1
- $2.27M
Value story
the property is valued on its current rent-roll income and trailing operating costs. The cap rate is provisional because no local cap-rate or sale evidence was available.
Chapter 5 · What does a buyer earn at this price?
The Buyer's Math
7.57%
at the valuation midpoint over a 7-year hold, with a 1.58× equity multiple.
The buyer's deal at the modeled price
Saved price and returns from the current analysis.
Modeled purchase price
$37,416,383
Valuation midpoint
$37,416,383
The price matches the valuation
Capital stack
- Loan
- $24.32M
- Buyer's cash at close
- $13.71M
Gross exit value $41.14M at a 6.75% exit cap
Return profile
Returns at $37,416,383
Levered IRR
7.57%
Equity multiple
1.58×
Minimum DSCR
1.19×
Debt yield
9.62%
Financing
Acquisition debt and minimum hold-period coverage
- Loan amount
- $24,320,649
- Initial equity
- $13,713,104
- Minimum DSCR
- 1.19×
- Debt yield
- 9.62%
Exit
Hold and sale outputs from the current model
- Exit NOI implied
- $2,777,119
- ÷ Exit cap
- 6.75%
- = Gross exit value
- $41,142,497
- − Selling costs
- −$617,137
- = Net sale proceeds before debt payoff
- $40,525,360
- Hold period
- 7 years
- Levered profit
- $7,980,332
Levered cash flow runs from $604.2K in Year 1 to $692.8K in Year 7, with a low of $416.3K in Year 3
Levered cash flow to the buyer, by year of the hold
Some source fields were unavailable.
- Effective gross income
- $4,606,981
- NOI
- $2,338,524
- Renovation CapEx
- $0
- Debt service
- $1,634,348
- Levered cash flow
- $604,176
- Effective gross income
- $4,697,073
- NOI
- $2,361,992
- Renovation CapEx
- $0
- Debt service
- $1,634,348
- Levered cash flow
- $624,644
- Effective gross income
- $4,813,864
- NOI
- $2,409,447
- Renovation CapEx
- $0
- Debt service
- $1,887,103
- Levered cash flow
- $416,254
- Effective gross income
- $4,955,304
- NOI
- $2,478,843
- Renovation CapEx
- $0
- Debt service
- $1,887,103
- Levered cash flow
- $482,467
- Effective gross income
- $5,100,914
- NOI
- $2,550,249
- Renovation CapEx
- $0
- Debt service
- $1,887,103
- Levered cash flow
- $550,595
- Effective gross income
- $5,250,815
- NOI
- $2,623,723
- Renovation CapEx
- $0
- Debt service
- $1,887,103
- Levered cash flow
- $620,693
- Effective gross income
- $5,405,135
- NOI
- $2,699,326
- Renovation CapEx
- $0
- Debt service
- $1,887,103
- Levered cash flow
- $692,817
Year 8 to Year 10 come after the 7-year hold and are shown for reference only.
Chapter 6 · What could affect this deal?
Risk & Market Watch
6 of 13
area indexes run above the national average around the property. They describe the area, not this parcel, and do not change the underwriting.
Larceny is highest at 1.55×; wind is lowest at 0.24×
Area index for the subject area, as a multiple of the national average
- Larceny1.55×
- Tornado1.40×
- Motor Vehicle Theft1.39×
- Burglary1.29×
- Murder1.28×
- Crime1.18×
- Hail0.95×
- Particulate Matter0.93×
- Air Pollution0.82×
- Ozone0.81×
- Hurricane0.66×
- Earthquake0.27×
- Wind0.24×
Market developments18
About this data
- Parcel records
- Available
- Community indexes
- Available
- Market web evidence
- Available
- Forward climate risk
- Unavailable
community data source does not disclose a field-level measurement vintage in this response.
Climate values are historical normals, not forward-looking property climate-loss estimates.
Community V4 did not return aggregate school count or rating fields; no separate school endpoint was called.
Some web claims or details could not be verified; retained findings include their limitations.
Some findings rely on search excerpts because full articles were not retrieved.
Some collected sources were outside this review's research budget.
Some property web details remain unverified, including dates where not disclosed.
Location indexes are area context, not property-loss predictions.
Market Watch never changes the underwriting automatically.